A redesigned Star Trek site is live. It is vastly redesigned from the old one, reflecting the design aspects of Star Trek but is (In my opinion) a much better running website. It includes a lot of information on the multiple series and movies, as well as interviews with the cast and crew that made those shows possible.
Yet that isn’t the reason I mention the website. I mention it because you can watch all 70 episodes of Star Trek: the Original Series on it as well as all the episodes of Star Trek: Enterprise. (Love it or hate it, that series has 89 episodes. Lasted longer then TOS.)
Click here to go to Star Trek Dot Com.
And if you re interested in the fictional reality of STar Trek, Memory Alpha is the place to go. It is a great wiki full of all kinds of Star Trek tidbits. From when the various uniforms were introduced to bringing the scattered stories of the Trek universe into some what continuity.
Click here for Memory Alpha.
Very cool.
The person that made the trailer for this movie did an excellent job. It constructed a movie that was funny, quirky, showed off interesting characters, and made me want to see it.
Then I started reading the reviews. Not just the reviews by critics, since I rarely tend to go by them, but of those that liked director Jare Hess’ other two films. (Napoleon Dynamite and Nocho Libre.) I love Napleon Dynamite. It is one of those movies that will be watched once a year or so with me randomly spouting lines from the movie at odd times. I really loved the idea behind Gentlemen Broncos too, but the reviews made my heart sink just a little bit.
Not that I ever let a review define how I view a movie.
Still I didn’t get around to watching Gentlemen Broncos until this weekend. I finally was able to view the movie I had really wanted to see.
So. How did I like it?
There are two different answers to that, one short and one a bit longer.
The short answer is: Not much, I was really disappointed in what I saw.
The long answer is this.
The movie is awkward. This isn’t the Napoleon Dynamite love it or hate it awkward either. It is more like a bad date. A date that you really don’t want to be on and you also know your date doesn’t want to be there. Yet you are both polite, the meal had been ordered, and you want to finish the food So you try to finish the meal and keep from boredom by striking up conversation with one another. Nothing seems to gel, the conversation is flat and stilted, and you go home thinking you enjoyed the food but wishing you had felt comfortable. You wanted to like the person better then you do but you know that it just didn’t happen. She reminds you of the date you had with her big sister but things are not quite the same.
I kept wanting to like this movie. There are parts in it that reminded me of real life, like when the main character and his female interest are talking about their writing. I’ve been in that conversation a million times with people I barely know. I understand how it is to go to a writer’s conference not knowing anyone. I’ve also felt the pang of disappointment when someone you looked up to from afar doesn’t quite measure up to how you want him or her to be.
The story is one I wanted to work. A failing but once successful novelist steals the work of a young writer. That works, it could be both dramatic and comedy gold. There is so much you could do with that premise.
Yet the premise isn’t used very well here. Instead of focusing in on the core of the story, the movie is filled with a lot of situations that just don’t really matter. This worked in Napoleon Dynamite, a movie that was able to rise above the awkwardness and show a slice of Napleon’s life, but it does not work here.
I think this movie had a chance to be so much better then it actually is.
I love the scenes depicting the two different versions of the same story. Those were great and is one of the best things about the Gentlemen Broncos
Loni, the film director, particularly annoyed me. In fact the whole subplot where he makes a film based on the main character’s work annoyed me. That whole section is one that should have been edited out of the script before filming even started.
The church angel could have been explained in more detail with more interaction between him and the main character’s mom.
The character of the writer Chevalier should’ve been explored more. He comes off as a very cardboard character but one that doesn’t have to be cardboard. Yet there is more to him, more then you see.
The main character… I think they did a good job with how he handled the experiences. With mostly resignation and later determination. Again he felt a little flat, his motivations through the movie not really that clear.
The female writer. There wasn’t enough of interaction between her and the main character. The interaction was so sparse… Some of it was just weird and not in a good way. Her kissing him right after he puked? It wasn’t funny, it was kind of disgusting.
The film was lopsided with most of the action happening at the end. I actually really enjoyed the end of the movie, from the scene where the mom goes to sell her wares on, but the lead up to it wasn’t that fun.
IT feels like the director wanted to make another Napoleon Dynamite but failed. He if he had focused on the strengths of the story while cutting alot of the fat, it would be a better movie. I know the trailer showed me a movie I wanted to see but the film did not live up to that expectation.
Now I want to go through and rewrite Gentlemen Broncos into the vision I saw in my head when I first saw the trailer…
Yes… I really love these commercials:
Ugh. I mean…Ugh.
Seriously? The CGI smurfs don’t even look that good. You know if you are going to make a Smurf CGI movie, give it to someone that can actually *make* a good CGI movie… Like Pixar.
And don’t set the Smurfs in the modern times. Their hippy lifestyle deserves to be part of a by gone era…Dang it.
Watch this and be…um…smurf’d.
It seems it is a push to remake the original 95 movie. Jeri Ryan played Sonya Blade in the piece and has been twittering about it:
- …(cont.) to push them to make it. But you guys are resourceful…!
about 5 hours ago via web - More MK FAQs: I did it as a favor to a friend. No idea yet what WB’s reaction to it was. And I’m not sure how you can contact WB…about 5 hours ago via web
- It’s not a game trailer. Actually was made for the director to sell WB on his vision for a reimagined MK film.about 5 hours ago via web
- Okay, so… Mortal Kombat.about 5 hours ago via web
You can find her twitter account by clicking here.
I could go for a kick butt reboot of the movie, that is for sure. I liked what I saw below. To give a bit of contrast, Here is a clip from the original Mortal Kombat movie:
Spike TV. The overblown hyperbole ladened “men’s” channel. Half the programs are so soaked in Executive decided testosterone that it is often hard to watch. Yet there are a few programs that draw me to the channel, like a bee to honey.
One of them is Deadliest Warrior. The idea behind the show is that it pits two opposite soldiers (or groups of soldiers) against each other. They pair up Knights versus Pirates, William Wallace versus Shaka Zulu, and other pairings.
The show is divided in to two teams who discuss and test the respective weapons for their warrior. At the end of the show all the information is inputed in to a simulation program. After that the results are shown on screen through a filmed reenactment.
I love the reenactment. The way many of them are staged should be seen by many Hollywood battle choreographers. (For one there is no “Shake-y cam.” I hate that….
Here is the last part from the Jesse James gang versus Al Capone’s gang episode:
If you like that, the whole first season can be watched online by clicking here. They also have it out on DVD.
Though I don’t agree with all the results, the show is a hoot to watch. It really gets to the core of that “This is a man’s show” mentality. Spike also has an aftermath web series where the people involved come back and discuss the show, using viewer questions as the foundation. Very cool. I’d love to work on this show.
